What is the proper word for the claim by Hillary Clinton and the more factually disinclined supporters of her campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination -- made in speeches, briefings and interviews (including one by this reporter with the candidate) -- that she has always been a critic of the North American Free Trade Agreement?
Well, some call this a lie, but may I suggest that all Hillary Clinton is guilty of here is being stupid. Oh yeah, and a compulsive poitital hack lier! But why wouldn't she tell lies that might get her the presidency? Becuase it's just not her time. Or so she's told. And probably to her own benfit.
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat?pid=300860
Monday, September 15, 2008
Why Does McCain Act Like He's Completely Insane? To Throw The Election.
John McCain is either insane or the GOP's presidential candidate is puposefully throwing this election. Either way, it apears McCain is throwing the election to Obama. Is this because he has been nstructed to do so? I don't know about McCain's sanity or senility, but I do know if the Republican Party were truely committed to winning this election, which is being touted as the most important election ever, they would not be sending McCain and Palin out there, acting the way they are!
McCain wouldn't be mumbling Bomb, Bomb, Bomb... Bomb Bomb Iran in public like the prospect of bombing Iran is a big fucking joke to him...
Neither would McCain be making globally televised comments about everyone knowing it is a fact that Iran is sponsoring, training, and sending Al Quida terrorists into Iraq then changing his tune when advised by his Jewish neo-nazi hack sidekick Joe Lieberman; not on live TV, not durring a carefully crafted press confrence. No Fucking Way!
Nor would Sara Palin (second place beauty queen wanabe become small town mayor and Governor of Alaska) be "chosen" as the GOP (i.e. John McCain's) vice presidential nominee.
No. There are too many crued anomalies in this equation for it to be considered remotely credible. The Fix Is In!
If the Republicans wanted their man in the Presidency, they would be playing a seriously different game. The McCain/Palin ticket is a ticket out of the presidency not into it. That's obvious. It is not really a campaign for the presidency so much as an exit strategy from the presidency.
Honestly! This is all history revisited. Look at the previous presidential election contests of Regan vs. Carter, Bush vs. Clinton ; Bush vs. Gore , Bush vs. Karry; all of these contests put an easilly hampered hampster against a multi-million dollar propaganda campaign. In each of these contests it was easy enough to see why the looser lost and why voters would select the winner by choice. It was so dialed in by the marketing scientists' focus groups that there was no doubt who would win based on focus group perceptions of their presentations.
Who do you think wins that battle? The selected candidate.
McCain wouldn't be mumbling Bomb, Bomb, Bomb... Bomb Bomb Iran in public like the prospect of bombing Iran is a big fucking joke to him...
No. There are too many crued anomalies in this equation for it to be considered remotely credible. The Fix Is In!
If the Republicans wanted their man in the Presidency, they would be playing a seriously different game. The McCain/Palin ticket is a ticket out of the presidency not into it. That's obvious. It is not really a campaign for the presidency so much as an exit strategy from the presidency.
Honestly! This is all history revisited. Look at the previous presidential election contests of Regan vs. Carter, Bush vs. Clinton ; Bush vs. Gore , Bush vs. Karry; all of these contests put an easilly hampered hampster against a multi-million dollar propaganda campaign. In each of these contests it was easy enough to see why the looser lost and why voters would select the winner by choice. It was so dialed in by the marketing scientists' focus groups that there was no doubt who would win based on focus group perceptions of their presentations.
Who do you think wins that battle? The selected candidate.
Why Did Hillary Clinton Tell This Lie? To Throw The Election.
The illusion of democracy is strong in the U.S. This video demonstrates, in my opinion, that the 2008 presidential elections are rigged and media collusion in making the process appear realistic is apparent. Watch this video of Hillary Clinton telling blatant lies for no apparent reason and ask yourself... Why?
Why would Hillary Clinton tell such an outrageous lie that she and all of her political advisers surely would know would be exposed within hours? CBS News recorded and reported the story when Hillary was in Bosnia, she knows this, and she tells this fabricated story at a key point in a close race for the Democratic Party nomination... Why? What could Hillary possibly have thought she had to gain by making up a fictitious story about her trip to Bosnia? Nothing from what I can see except that she either did not want to become president or she was instructed to stage this public portrayal of herself as a pathological liar who cannot be trusted in order to send supporters and potential voters to Obama. Why?
This was my first indication that the 2008 Presidential Elections are a sham. The fix is in. And Hillary Clinton took a dive for the party or whatever. I don't know why she did it, but the timing of this event, the lack of any apparent motivation or potential benefit, and the quickness with which it was exposed make this defining event appear to me like a boxer taking a dive... "In the fifth, your ass goes down" Say it. "In the fifth my ass goes down." And that's the way it happened.
Why would Hillary Clinton tell such an outrageous lie that she and all of her political advisers surely would know would be exposed within hours? CBS News recorded and reported the story when Hillary was in Bosnia, she knows this, and she tells this fabricated story at a key point in a close race for the Democratic Party nomination... Why? What could Hillary possibly have thought she had to gain by making up a fictitious story about her trip to Bosnia? Nothing from what I can see except that she either did not want to become president or she was instructed to stage this public portrayal of herself as a pathological liar who cannot be trusted in order to send supporters and potential voters to Obama. Why?
This was my first indication that the 2008 Presidential Elections are a sham. The fix is in. And Hillary Clinton took a dive for the party or whatever. I don't know why she did it, but the timing of this event, the lack of any apparent motivation or potential benefit, and the quickness with which it was exposed make this defining event appear to me like a boxer taking a dive... "In the fifth, your ass goes down" Say it. "In the fifth my ass goes down." And that's the way it happened.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
